Posts

Showing posts from January, 2023

The Machine which is registered under the PCPNDT Act cannot be carried to other place which is not registered" -Bombay High Court. In short, One Machine - One Place - One Registration. Adv ROHiT ERANDE ©

  The Machine which is registered under the PCPNDT Act cannot be carried to other place which is not registered" -Bombay High Court. In short, One Machine - One Place - One Registration. Adv. ROHiT ERANDE © In its recently reported judgment of Dr. Deepak Sane V/s. State of Maharashtra, 2017(1) Mh.L.J.379, W.P. no.2995/2015, The Division Bench at Nagpur held so.. Facts in short : 1. The petitioner is the leading Medical Practitioner in Nagpur and dealing exclusively with Heart Treatment. He is required to use the 2D Echo Colour Doppler Machine for Treating his patients and for treating the patients he requires to visit the ICCU at different Hospitals. 2. IT was the case of the petitioner that he needy patients who cannot come to his clinic, for them he has to carry his 2D Echo machine, which is duly registered under the provisions of PCPNDT Act.Therefore he applied to the concerned authorities for getting permission to move the said machine at different places, but same was rejec

A Senior Gynaecologist fined for doing Anomaly Scan as it missed the Anomaly, Important Judgment : Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©

"  Anomaly Scan   should be done by the Specialist like qualified Radiologist or Fetal Medicine expert and not by the Gynaecologist. " "Any Radiologist of ordinary prudence, could have detected such abnormality and it could have averted the patient’s sufferings. She could have aborted the baby within 20 weeks of pregnancy. "  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE © DR. USHA MUKHI HARYANA, V/s.  SEEMA DESWAL & ANR. REVISION PETITION NO. 2780 OF 2017  (Against the Order dated 15/03/2017 in Appeal No. 1051/2015 of the State Commission Haryana) Judgment Link : http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FRP%2F2350%2F2017&dtofhearing=2023-01-09 BEFORE:     HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER Dated : 09 Jan 2023 Facts in short : 1      The case of the Complainant - Seema Deswal (patient) that during her pregnancy, she was under consultation of Dr. Usha Mukhi (OP-1), who performed USG sev

An Important Case for Hospital, Surgeons and Anesthetists : Adv. ROHiT ERANDE. ©

A case which underlines the importance of proper training to Nurses. "The remark 'Awake' put by an Anesthetist should be read in medical parlance over the remark "drowsy" put by the Nurse" " The hypoxic event could be managed by the Anesthetist and we don’t think  any neurologist to be present at that time" Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.  ©   Before Hon'ble NCDRC, Delhi  CONSUMER CASE NO. 361 OF 2001   SMT. MAMTA AGARWAL & ORS. AMRAWATI, MAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s) Versus   BOMBAY HOSPITAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE & ORS. ...........Opp.Party(s) The judgment Link : http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FOP%2F361%2F2001&dtofhearing=2022-12-22 BEFORE:     HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER Brief Facts: 1.     The facts go back to 1998.   On 28.10.1998, Mr. Vijay Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the ‘patient -deceased’), fell down fr