Posts

Showing posts from December, 2023

Wrong measurement of the lens power by Technician is error of judgment, not negligence. The narrow-escape for the Ophthalmologist - Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©

  Wrong measurement of the lens power by Technician proved to be the narrow-escape for the Ophthalmologist. T he wrong measurement of the lens power was the error of judgment on the part of the technician   and  not negligence , due to various responsible factors  - Adv. ROHiT ERANDE © Case Details : NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,  NEW DELHI   REVISION PETITION NO. 99 OF 2019 (Against the Order dated 05/06/2018 in Appeal No. 438/2015 of the State Commission Maharashtra) PRAJAKTA PRADEEP MULAY Versus   VINOD GOYAL,  MUMBAI Judgment link.  https://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FRP%2F99%2F2019&dtofhearing=2023-12-13 BEFORE:     HON'BLE DR. INDER JIT SINGH,PRESIDING MEMBER Order Dated : 13 December 2023 Facts in brief : The case goes back to 2008 ! 1. The   complainant a retired doctor herself due to eye problems,  consulted the  OP /...

To be Cocksure about Experience over adverse Tests reports costed 25 lakhs to a SR. Doctor and life to a patient. - Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©

  Inspite of the TB Reports being negative, the Senior Physician - Cardiologist continued with the TB Medicines relying on his Clinical skills, resulted in to the Death of a Patient. Saddled with Rs.25 lakhs as compensation.   Adv. ROHiT ERANDE  ©   Before : NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI Case no. : CONSUMER CASE NO. 2860 OF 2017  Judgment Link : https://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FCC%2F2860%2F2017&dtofhearing=2023-10-11 KANIKA DAS (Complainant) V/s.    SURYA POLYCLINIC & ANR. KOLKATA. (Opponents) BEFORE:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA,PRESIDING MEMBER  HON'BLE BHARATKUMAR PANDYA,MEMBER   ORDER Dated : 11 October 2023 Facts in Short : 1.     Smt. Kanika Das filed the complaint for declaring that the opposite parties had committed deficiency in service in not providing adequate and appropriate ...