"It's Wrong to stamp a doctor as negligent whenever something goes wrong"

"A doctor need not be held negligent simply because something went wrong" - National Commission dismissed case for compensation of Rs.70 lakhs.

Yet Again the national Commission reiterated the view of Apex Court in its recent judgment of Sunil Kumar Gupta V/s. Escorts Heart Center.

Facts :
1. The 24 yrs old Complainant was suffering VSD (Ventricular Septal Defect) in the heart, since childhood.
2. The patient was operated for VSD, but after 2 months patient felt some heart problems and when he got further checkup done, he learnt that the VSD was not closed but the valve of his heart has been replaced during operation.
3. Thus the Complainant alleged Fraud upon Doctors and claimed Rs. 70 lakhs as compensation.
Doctors side :
1. at the time of operation it was found that patient was having Severe Aortic Regurgitation, the surgeon came outside the operation theatre and explained the condition of Aortic valve(AV) to the relatives of patient.
2.Thereafter, with consent, the AV was replaced and VSD closure was done.

Held :
1. The Commission relied upon the stand of Doctors, after perusing medical record and held that there was no medical negligence.
2. The patient was in good health for 1 year 4 months, after operation.
3. It held that AVR was necessary to save the patient from complications of severe aortic regurgitation.
4. Lastly it relied upon the judgments of Apex Court in the case of Dr. Laxman Balkrishna v. Dr. Trimbak AIR 1969 SC 128; Indian Medical Association v. V. P. Santha, 1995 6 SCC 651 wherein it was held that :
“A doctor need not be held negligent simply because something went wrong. The doctor is not liable for negligence because of someone else of better skill or knowledge would have prescribed a different treatment or operated in a different way."

" He is not guilty of negligence, if he has acted in accordance with the practice accepted as proper by a reasonable body of medical professionals. The skill of a medical practitioner differs from doctor to doctor and it is incumbent upon the complainant to prove that a doctor was negligent in the line of treatment that resulted in the life of the patient."

Thanks and Regards,

Adv. Rohit Erande
Pune.©

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency – Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital “Its in the interest of Patients that Doctors. should not be dragged to the Court unnecessarily”” – National Commission observed while dismissing the Compliant for damages of Rs.2.5 Crores as it prevents Doctors from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost. A Physician is free to decide whom he will serve, save in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital Case : SUMAN TANEJA V/s. METRO HOSPITAL & HEART INSTITUTE & 3 ORS, decided on 02/02/2016. Factual Matrix in nutshell : 1. The Complainant, widow of deceased patient claimed damages to the tune of Rs. Two & half Crores on the ground that her husband who was diagnosed as Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI).did not receive the emergency treatment in Golden Hours.The Doctor ...
Read more

A "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.-Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.©

 The "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.© a. Non availability of Operation Theatre is not a valid ground to hold Hospital Negligent : b. Non functioning of Machines and Equipments cannot be said to be Negligence. c. It is an incorrect assumption to say that, "since surgery was performed by a doctor, he alone would be responsible for different aspects of the treatment required and given to the patient". d. It is too much to expect from a doctor to remain on the bed side of the patient throughout his stay in the hospital. e. Every death of a patient cannot on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence. f.  In spite of the treatment, if the patient had not survived, the doctors cannot be blamed as even the doctors with the best of their abilities cannot prevent the inevitable g. The doctor cannot be held liable for medical negligence by applying the doctrine of  res ips...
Read more

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section " The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (MSCDRC) in its recent judgment dated 31/03/2017, gave the verdict against the Doctor, but absolved the Hospital.. Case details - Mr.Prashant Tamhane V/s. P.D. hinduja Hospital and anr. CC No.221 of 2003. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetPdf.do… Facts in short : 1. This is the case of 2002. The wife (since deceased) of the Complainant was admitted in the Hospital after the blood reports revealed symptoms of hepatitis. There she was examined by Dr.Ashit Hegde, the Opponent no.2 Doctor in the present case. At that time he after examining the patient he thought it fit for not admitting the patient. By taking medication she was improving. 2.However after about one month, she had Chest pain and difficulty in breathing. Initial X-ray was normal, but in later X-ray, she was diagno...
Read more