A case of Rs.80 lakhs dismissed which alleged that Sedatives caused Cardiac arrest to alcoholic patient..

" The Complaint for Rs.80 lakhs alleging that Sedatives should not have been given to Alcoholic Patient as it caused cardiac arrest and complications, was dismissed "
The State Commission of Maharashtra, in the case of Smt.Rohini H. Merchant & ors. V/s. Sir H.N.Reliance Foundation Hospital & anr. has dealt with important factors.

Factual Matrix in short :

1. The deceased patient - husband of Complainant No.1 Mr.Harendra J.Merchant was a Captain in Navy. It was contdned that he gave up his habitual consumption of liquor 25 years back.
2.But in the year 2005, when he was sailing near Andaman and Nicobar Islands, after seeing the hundreds of people dying to the Tsunami, he was psychologically and mentally disturbed and signed off the ship in February 2005 and due to trauma, he again started consuming alcohol after a long gap.
3.That, to treat the patient for proper detoxification, he was admitted on or about 13/12/2005 in the Hospital which claimed to have all the facilities. After some time he had chest congestion and thus requested to administer only saline as he consumed alcohol and also had cough.
4. However the in house Doctor injected only a sedative “Serenace 10 mg & as the patient started breathing very heavily with hissing sounds, he was injected “Phenergan”. After 45 minutes, he suffered cardiac arrest ad he was shifted to ICU.
5. It was alleged that in between he was shifted to general ward and he had 2nd arrest on 19/12/2005 and he went in Coma and remained in the same state for almost 2 years till his death i.e. on 15/09/2007.
6. it was alleged that the sedative should not have been given to alcoholic patient which caused cardiac arrest and the facilities of treatment were also reduced from A class to general Ward and hence on various grounds, total compensation of Rs.80 lakhs was claimed.
7. The Hospital and the Doctors refuted all the allegations.

Held :
1. After going through the documents, record, judgments of Apex Court and after hearing of the parties the Commission dismissed the complaint.
2. IT was held that the Complaint is not barred by law of limitation. The Opponents examined the expert witness Dr.Yusuf Abdulla Matchiswalla, M.D. Psychological Medicine who stated on oath that the combination of the drug serenace and phenergan as intramuscular and intra- venous injections can be safely given in doses as high as 40 mg. in patients of alcohol and presenting with psychotic symptoms and disruptive behavior.No independent expert opinion was produced by the Complainant.
3. .the patient was initially hospitalized in Jaslok hospital where he was diagnosed as “Alcohol abuse –acute alcohol intoxication” and was administered Injection Serenace, but had no Cardiac arrest.
4. It also came on record that the class of treatment was reduced to general ward due to financial constraints of the Complainants and the body of the patient was also not retained.
IT's the prerogative of treating Doctor to decide the line of treatment and the Apex court has repeatedly held that A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art. The death of our near one is always traumatic. However it's not that every death of patient, the Doctor is responsible. I don't think there will be any doctor who will purposely give wrong treatment to his/her patients. The Doctor is not a GOD.

Thanks and Regards,

Pune. ©

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency – Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital “Its in the interest of Patients that Doctors. should not be dragged to the Court unnecessarily”” – National Commission observed while dismissing the Compliant for damages of Rs.2.5 Crores as it prevents Doctors from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost. A Physician is free to decide whom he will serve, save in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital Case : SUMAN TANEJA V/s. METRO HOSPITAL & HEART INSTITUTE & 3 ORS, decided on 02/02/2016. Factual Matrix in nutshell : 1. The Complainant, widow of deceased patient claimed damages to the tune of Rs. Two & half Crores on the ground that her husband who was diagnosed as Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI).did not receive the emergency treatment in Golden Hours.The Doctor ...
Read more

A "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.-Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.©

 The "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.© a. Non availability of Operation Theatre is not a valid ground to hold Hospital Negligent : b. Non functioning of Machines and Equipments cannot be said to be Negligence. c. It is an incorrect assumption to say that, "since surgery was performed by a doctor, he alone would be responsible for different aspects of the treatment required and given to the patient". d. It is too much to expect from a doctor to remain on the bed side of the patient throughout his stay in the hospital. e. Every death of a patient cannot on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence. f.  In spite of the treatment, if the patient had not survived, the doctors cannot be blamed as even the doctors with the best of their abilities cannot prevent the inevitable g. The doctor cannot be held liable for medical negligence by applying the doctrine of  res ips...
Read more

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section " The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (MSCDRC) in its recent judgment dated 31/03/2017, gave the verdict against the Doctor, but absolved the Hospital.. Case details - Mr.Prashant Tamhane V/s. P.D. hinduja Hospital and anr. CC No.221 of 2003. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetPdf.do… Facts in short : 1. This is the case of 2002. The wife (since deceased) of the Complainant was admitted in the Hospital after the blood reports revealed symptoms of hepatitis. There she was examined by Dr.Ashit Hegde, the Opponent no.2 Doctor in the present case. At that time he after examining the patient he thought it fit for not admitting the patient. By taking medication she was improving. 2.However after about one month, she had Chest pain and difficulty in breathing. Initial X-ray was normal, but in later X-ray, she was diagno...
Read more