Incase of patient taking DAMA, Doctors cannot be held Negligent. Rs. 10.50 Lakhs case dismissed

"The Patient getting Discharge / Leaving the Hospital against the Medical Advice (DAMA / LAMA) no negligence can be attributed to Doctors",

http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FRP%2F2369%2F2016&dtofhearing=2017-01-31

(Patient)Leaving Against Medical Advise, popularly also known as DAMA/LAMA, is the scenario which might be seen in various hospitals routinely. This Judgment is a lesson for patients and for Doctors as well, as it yet again emphasises the importance of proper treatment and maintaining the record.

Case details - TARLOK CHAND MATTU V/s. M/S. VASAL HOSPITAL & ANR.
REVISION PETITION NO. 2369 OF 2016.
Decided on 31 Jan 2017

Allegations of the Complainant in short :
1. The Patient in this case i.e. the wife of the complainant, was admitted in the Hospital and was shifted to ICU. Certain tests worth Rs.1900/- were conducted, but reports were not shown to the Complainant nor the ailment details were shared with him. The complainant, who is a handicapped, had to run from pillar to post for seeking medical assistance.
2. The Complainant and the Patient were pushed out from the Hospital in a very inhuman manner. The Ambulance was also arranged by the Complaint at his expense and not by the Hospital and on way the Patient passed away.
3. Hence the Complaint was filed for Rs. 10,50,000/-

Defense of Hospital :
1. The patient with symptoms of fever, nausea, body ache, vomiting and weakness was admitted in ER and was attended by the emergency doctors and was treated properly.
2. After certain tests, it was diagnosed that the Patient had Leucopenia (Low White Cells), Thrombocytopenia (Low Platelets Count), High SGOT, SGPT (Liver Enzymes) and viral fever with hepatitis.
3. Due to then existing epidemic of dengue fever in the city, a provisional diagnosis of dengue fever was made.
4. However after few hours, the patient’s condition started worsening, may be due to Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS). The patient’s attendants were also informed about her condition and the treatment given. In this course, the patient left against the Medical Advice.
However, both the lower forums on evidence, dismissed the Complaint and hence the Revision was filed in national Commission.

Held :
The National Commission after perusing the evidence on record and after hearing of the parties on merits and relying upon landmark judgments of Hon. Supreme Court, dismissed the Revision and observed as :
1. The Complainant failed to establish as to exactly what the Doctor ought to have done. There was no iota of evidence to buttresses the allegation that the patient was not given proper treatment.
2. All the necessary treatment to prevent the Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS), which is a common complication of such viral fever, was given.
3. If the Patient had left against medical advice and there is no material on record to establish that the care, which ought to have been taken, has not been taken, no negligence can be attributed to Doctors.

The Doctors colleagues must have faced such situation at least once in their practice. As it is said “No record is no defense and poor record is poor defense”, this case exactly emphasises this aspect. If the patient is not satisfied with the treatment, he has every right to change the Doctor / Hospital and in such cases, proper documentation, consents are essential, that may in turn protect Doctors if the cases are filed.

Thanks and Regards,

Adv. Rohit Erande
Pune. ©

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency – Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital “Its in the interest of Patients that Doctors. should not be dragged to the Court unnecessarily”” – National Commission observed while dismissing the Compliant for damages of Rs.2.5 Crores as it prevents Doctors from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost. A Physician is free to decide whom he will serve, save in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital Case : SUMAN TANEJA V/s. METRO HOSPITAL & HEART INSTITUTE & 3 ORS, decided on 02/02/2016. Factual Matrix in nutshell : 1. The Complainant, widow of deceased patient claimed damages to the tune of Rs. Two & half Crores on the ground that her husband who was diagnosed as Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI).did not receive the emergency treatment in Golden Hours.The Doctor ...
Read more

A "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.-Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.©

 The "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.© a. Non availability of Operation Theatre is not a valid ground to hold Hospital Negligent : b. Non functioning of Machines and Equipments cannot be said to be Negligence. c. It is an incorrect assumption to say that, "since surgery was performed by a doctor, he alone would be responsible for different aspects of the treatment required and given to the patient". d. It is too much to expect from a doctor to remain on the bed side of the patient throughout his stay in the hospital. e. Every death of a patient cannot on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence. f.  In spite of the treatment, if the patient had not survived, the doctors cannot be blamed as even the doctors with the best of their abilities cannot prevent the inevitable g. The doctor cannot be held liable for medical negligence by applying the doctrine of  res ips...
Read more

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section " The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (MSCDRC) in its recent judgment dated 31/03/2017, gave the verdict against the Doctor, but absolved the Hospital.. Case details - Mr.Prashant Tamhane V/s. P.D. hinduja Hospital and anr. CC No.221 of 2003. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetPdf.do… Facts in short : 1. This is the case of 2002. The wife (since deceased) of the Complainant was admitted in the Hospital after the blood reports revealed symptoms of hepatitis. There she was examined by Dr.Ashit Hegde, the Opponent no.2 Doctor in the present case. At that time he after examining the patient he thought it fit for not admitting the patient. By taking medication she was improving. 2.However after about one month, she had Chest pain and difficulty in breathing. Initial X-ray was normal, but in later X-ray, she was diagno...
Read more