Doctors : Victims of new form of Untouchability ?

Doctors :  Victims of new form of Untouchability ?

Adv. ROHiT Erande. ©

At one hand we are applauding Medicos as Corona Warriors, flower petals ae being showered on them, but at the other hand, Doctors are atiat some places are being treated as if they are untouchables. 

The decease of Untouchability was removed legally, thanks to our Constitution Makers. However in reality it erupts with new faces.
Let's see few examples.

A) I came across recently a post of a Doctor. He visited a patient's place to check the patient. The Doctor demanded torch and when Doctor returned back, the wife of patient refused to touch it !!. 

B) There are many examples where Doctors have been refused to enter thier own clinic and Society said no entry for Doctors, as members may get infected with Corona.

C) Few news were more  disheartening where Doctors were not allowed to enter the Society where they reside !!
These are the same doctors to whom others go for treatment as that time thier neighbour is a Doctor.. 

D) In a recent post which got viral, it has been revealed that in Mumbai more Interns Doctors alleged to  have been qurantined due to exposure, if they found violating Covid-19 discipline, then such person will require to repeat internship for the qurantine period. !

There might be similar other situations which many of the Medicos must have come across. Incidents of violence against   Doctors are reduced (may I say so ? ) . Otherwise Corona Warriors had to practically shed thier blood. 

 Exceptions too..
Still, there are good elements in the Society who are helping Medicos in current situation. In some Societies neighbours are bringing vegetables, milk etc for thier Doctor Neighbour  Every thing is not rotten.  However the percentage is less.

But after watching over all scenario a question may come to your mind, where are we heading ? Let's hope people will realise that a time is not far where you will have to rely on search engines for treatment...

 Adv. ROHiT Erande.
Pune.©

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency – Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital “Its in the interest of Patients that Doctors. should not be dragged to the Court unnecessarily”” – National Commission observed while dismissing the Compliant for damages of Rs.2.5 Crores as it prevents Doctors from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost. A Physician is free to decide whom he will serve, save in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital Case : SUMAN TANEJA V/s. METRO HOSPITAL & HEART INSTITUTE & 3 ORS, decided on 02/02/2016. Factual Matrix in nutshell : 1. The Complainant, widow of deceased patient claimed damages to the tune of Rs. Two & half Crores on the ground that her husband who was diagnosed as Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI).did not receive the emergency treatment in Golden Hours.The Doctor ...
Read more

A "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.-Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.©

 The "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.© a. Non availability of Operation Theatre is not a valid ground to hold Hospital Negligent : b. Non functioning of Machines and Equipments cannot be said to be Negligence. c. It is an incorrect assumption to say that, "since surgery was performed by a doctor, he alone would be responsible for different aspects of the treatment required and given to the patient". d. It is too much to expect from a doctor to remain on the bed side of the patient throughout his stay in the hospital. e. Every death of a patient cannot on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence. f.  In spite of the treatment, if the patient had not survived, the doctors cannot be blamed as even the doctors with the best of their abilities cannot prevent the inevitable g. The doctor cannot be held liable for medical negligence by applying the doctrine of  res ips...
Read more

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section " The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (MSCDRC) in its recent judgment dated 31/03/2017, gave the verdict against the Doctor, but absolved the Hospital.. Case details - Mr.Prashant Tamhane V/s. P.D. hinduja Hospital and anr. CC No.221 of 2003. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetPdf.do… Facts in short : 1. This is the case of 2002. The wife (since deceased) of the Complainant was admitted in the Hospital after the blood reports revealed symptoms of hepatitis. There she was examined by Dr.Ashit Hegde, the Opponent no.2 Doctor in the present case. At that time he after examining the patient he thought it fit for not admitting the patient. By taking medication she was improving. 2.However after about one month, she had Chest pain and difficulty in breathing. Initial X-ray was normal, but in later X-ray, she was diagno...
Read more