Pune based Hospital and Doctors absolved from the allegations of causing death of a Lawyer-Gravida due to Injection Tramadol. Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©

Pune based Hospital and Doctors absolved from the allegations of causing death of a Lawyer-Gravida due to Injection Tramadol. 

The Court held doctors are faced with dilemma and they have to choose lesser Evil from the options available 

Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©

REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2019

 (Against the Order dated 11/06/2019 in Appeal No. 439/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra)

 PANDHARINATH WAGHOLE V/s. SANJEEVANI HOSPITAL & 3 ORS, PUNE

BEFORE:  

  HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER

  HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER                 

Judgment Link :

http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetJudgement.do?method=GetJudgement&caseidin=0%2F0%2FRP%2F2200%2F2019&dtofhearing=2023-03-22

 Pronounced on:  22nd March  2023

Facts in short :

 1.       The instant Revision Petition was filed by the Petitioner/ Original Complainant against the Order dated 11.06.2019 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (Circuit Bench at Pune)   whereby the State Commission allowed the Appeal preferred by the Respondents/Opposite Parties against the order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the Pune District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum  wherein the present Petitioner was granted Rs.10,00,000/- as a compensation from the Respondents -Hospital /Doctors.

2.       The wife of Complainant, Mrs. Indira Waghole  was an Advocate by profession, was taking treatment from the Opposite Parties for pregnancy and consulted the Respondent No. 2 for abdominal pain in the hospital on 24.08.2009. On the next day, she was admitted in the hospital and received treatment .  At about 11.15 p.m., the patient received Injection Tramadol, after which she was serious.  Since later she became critical and shifted to OP-4.  She didn’t respond to the treatment given by the OPs-1 & 4 and died during treatment. 

3. Aggrieved by the death of wife, the Complainant filed Complaint before the District Forum, Pune and the District Forum while allowing the Complaint awarded compensation of Rs. 10 lakh to the Complainant.


4.       Being aggrieved, the OP-1 to 4 filed the Appeal before the State Commission.  The State Commission allowed the Appeal and set aside the Order of the District Forum with the following observations:

“We have gone through medical records, literature and citations. Deceased Mrs. Indira, was apparently well till 11.30 pm and after injection tramadol, she became restless and unresponsive later. As per the literature on Tramadol, this kind of reaction does not occur after Injection Tramadol.  For the whole day 25**^August 2009, she was in the process of labour with mouth of cervix-uterus open. In this case the patient was immediately attended by qualified Gynaecologist, emergency management started by giving CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation) after finding that the heart sounds were audible, patient was transported to higher centre at about 12.30am ( on 26 August 2009) in cardiac ambulance. 

In such situation, even though qualified, the doctors are faced with dilemma and they have to choose lesser Evil from the options available. In the instant case, the doctors in good faith decided to shift the patient to higher centre-in proper manner by cardiac ambulance, utilised the chance to save patients life that was priority. We find that in small window of time period available (around one hour), the team decided to shift the patient. The citation considered by district forum, is not applicable to the present case as doctors in good faith shifted this patient to Jehangir Hospital. Hence we find that the District Forum has not considered the emergency situation as well as efforts taken by qualified doctors to save patient's life. The answer to POINT no. 2 is NEGATIVE.”

Held : 

1. The NCDRC observed that from the record it is pertinent to note that on 24.08.2009, the patient received antibiotics and injection tramadol at 11pm. Again, on the next day, around 11pm, injection tramadol was given for controlling her labour pains. After 10-15 minutes of the injection, the patient became restless and felt suffocating. She was immediately attended and emergency treatment was given with oxygen. 

2. It was further observed that it is pertinent to note that the injection tramadol taken a day prior (24th) did not show any reaction. The Committee of experts Medical Board at Sassoon Hospital also held that there was no medical negligence. The PM report revealed torrent’s larynx and the cause of death   as “suggestive of traumatic intubation”, however the PM findings are devoid of the trauma or damage to larynx or trachea. The cause of death was due to pulmonary embolism or severe drug reaction, but not due to the treatment given at OP hospital.

3. The record showed that after the injection of Tramadol at 11.30 pm, suddenly the patient showed erythematous rashes over the body, red froth coming from mouth with locked jaw. Immediately the patient was intubated, CPR was started and for tertiary ICU management the patient was immediately shifted to Jahangir Hospital by ambulance with doctors. On arrival to Jahangir Hospital, CPR was continued and at 1.00 am. 

4. In the instant case the prime concern was to save the mother and already the intrauterine death of fetus was confirmed by USG. The patient was declared dead at 1.20am at Jahangir Hospital.    

5. Based on the discussion above, it was observed that we do not find the Opponent Doctors and hospital liable for the medical negligence. There was neither breach in duty of care nor any negligence during the delivery of the patient. Administration of injection Tramadol is not contraindicated for labour pains. The doctors have made their efforts to save the patient, but failed. The unfortunate incident shall not consider being medical negligence.

This judgment gives important relief to Medicos by holding that when Doctors do their job properly, they cannot be held responsible for the failed result and in emergency situation, Doctors have to make a choice between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea. No doubt, the loss of companion is beyond any monetary compensation and it is irreparable loss. But there are certain things which are beyond control of Medical Science and at times Doctors inspite of their all out efforts, just have to watch !!

Thanks and Regards


Adv. ROHiT ERANDE ©


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency – Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital

A Physician is free to decide whom he/she will serve, except in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital “Its in the interest of Patients that Doctors. should not be dragged to the Court unnecessarily”” – National Commission observed while dismissing the Compliant for damages of Rs.2.5 Crores as it prevents Doctors from discharging their duty to a suffering person who needs their assistance utmost. A Physician is free to decide whom he will serve, save in case of Emergency –  Court rejects 2.5 Crore petition against Doctor & Hospital Case : SUMAN TANEJA V/s. METRO HOSPITAL & HEART INSTITUTE & 3 ORS, decided on 02/02/2016. Factual Matrix in nutshell : 1. The Complainant, widow of deceased patient claimed damages to the tune of Rs. Two & half Crores on the ground that her husband who was diagnosed as Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI).did not receive the emergency treatment in Golden Hours.The Doctor ...
Read more

A "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.-Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.©

 The "Supreme Judgment" with manifold reliefs to Doctors and Hospital : Perhaps the year end gift for Doctors.  Adv. ROHiT ERANDE.© a. Non availability of Operation Theatre is not a valid ground to hold Hospital Negligent : b. Non functioning of Machines and Equipments cannot be said to be Negligence. c. It is an incorrect assumption to say that, "since surgery was performed by a doctor, he alone would be responsible for different aspects of the treatment required and given to the patient". d. It is too much to expect from a doctor to remain on the bed side of the patient throughout his stay in the hospital. e. Every death of a patient cannot on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence. f.  In spite of the treatment, if the patient had not survived, the doctors cannot be blamed as even the doctors with the best of their abilities cannot prevent the inevitable g. The doctor cannot be held liable for medical negligence by applying the doctrine of  res ips...
Read more

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section

"MD Medicine Dr. fined Rs.41 lakh for doing pleural tapping test without Sonography, that too in Causality section " The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, (MSCDRC) in its recent judgment dated 31/03/2017, gave the verdict against the Doctor, but absolved the Hospital.. Case details - Mr.Prashant Tamhane V/s. P.D. hinduja Hospital and anr. CC No.221 of 2003. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcusersWeb/GetPdf.do… Facts in short : 1. This is the case of 2002. The wife (since deceased) of the Complainant was admitted in the Hospital after the blood reports revealed symptoms of hepatitis. There she was examined by Dr.Ashit Hegde, the Opponent no.2 Doctor in the present case. At that time he after examining the patient he thought it fit for not admitting the patient. By taking medication she was improving. 2.However after about one month, she had Chest pain and difficulty in breathing. Initial X-ray was normal, but in later X-ray, she was diagno...
Read more